Reno Poker Club. The biggest little poker room online
 

The word “Poker” makes everyone think about Reno, Nevada and of great Vegas Poker Rooms, poker games and challenging poker players. There are so many games at the big little city, Reno. Anyway, if you find yourself at Reno you’ll find real good card rooms and the different games that are spread in Reno card rooms. Reno Poker Club brings you the latest Caribbean cruises and Reno Hold’em tourneys information.

Check out this terrific prize for the winners of a Hold’em Poker game. The WPS Poker Cruise is offering a chance to win on their Caribbean Poker Cruise 2006, leading up to the Main Event Tournament with a prize-pool! The WPS Caribbean Poker Cruise will be taking off from Dec 11 through Dec 18 2005. That sounds really cool huh?!!

Poker Cruise Port Canaveral
December 11-18, 2005
Only 12 cabins left.
Call 1-800-582-8069 now

Easy-Sign-Up       Email-Contact
Play for real money in the 2nd Caribbean Poker Cruise 2005
Poker Tournaments with Greg Raymer

Here you can find information about Reno poker rooms and card rooms as well as Reno poker tournaments. Fresh news about Reno Poker players such as Daniel Negreanu, Michael Mizrachi, poker veteran Lee Watkinson among others.

And of course we can’t leave out the monthly events taking place at Reno Hilton. Poker players can’t miss going to the Reno Hilton hotel for Reno poker games.

I’ve also included some limited information on the finer points of Poker in the pages of Reno Poker Club. Maybe it will help someone become a better Poker player, and it gives me an opportunity to show off my brilliance. Poker is like fishing and golf. We all like to brag.

Should you have any questions or comments, please don’t hesitate to contact us

These are just some of the latest news that Reno Poker Club brings you within the days.

 

New Poker Section on Fox Sports

April 22, 2005


Fox Sports Network
Source: pPlayer

FOX Sports has added a poker section to its website, and it's not bad. The fact that it comes almost nine months after I pointed out that FSN was attempting to get into the poker business with no mention of poker anywhere online is astonishing to me. For almost the full year since Championship Poker at the Plaza debuted on FSN, a search for "poker" on FOXSports.com would net you absolutely no results. No listings, no articles, no requisite hype...nada.

That said, Fox is now rolling along with Poker Allstar II listings, fresh articles, and even video from the (very good) Beyond the Glory: Legends of Poker. Give it a whirl, it's been a long time in the making...

Thanks to Harold for bringing the Fox Sports site to my attention.
Advertise on The Poker Web via Poker Media Group and reach your customers through our network of 50 poker related poker sites.

Has No-limit (NL) hold'em Reached its Maximum ?

April 20, 2005

Matt Lessinger
by Matt Lessinger

No-limit (NL) hold'em has exploded. It's popping up everywhere, novice players are jumping into NL games, and the action is better than ever. We know all of that. However, people who have played NL for years aren't adjusting properly to this new status quo. Online Tips and Strategies that were accepted as truths as recently as two or three years ago now have to be reconsidered, especially in live NL games with buy-ins of $300 or less. Let's look at one of them:

As the first player entering the pot, you should raise about three times the big blind (BB).

In both tournaments and live poker events, this has been the accepted norm for a long time, and the logic makes perfect sense. You want to raise enough to get the garbage out, including the players in the blinds. But, you don't want to raise so much that you'll get action only from someone who has you beat. Tripling the BB usually accomplished that goal.

But nowadays, you'll see a player raise to three times the BB and still get six or seven callers! Clearly, they all can't have a playable hand. So much for getting the garbage out! Now, you've got a decent-size pot before the flop comes, and unless you flop a big hand, it's tough to bet with confidence, having so many opponents. Even with a hand like pocket aces, you want action, but not that much action! In those types of games, which are more and more prevalent these days, you have to do something different.

Should you raise more or not raise at all?

It depends on the hand and the situation. For instance, my friend Jake was in the BB a $1-$2 blinds NL game with the Aclubs Kdiamonds. Every single player limped in preflop! He was pretty sure that he had the best hand, so he threw in a $25 raise. He still got four callers! Then, the flop came J-9-2, missing him completely. He ended up checking and folding, and lamented the fact that he wasted $25.

In Jake's situation, a small raise would have accomplished nothing, and his larger raise ended up being expensive when the flop brought rags. I would have chosen not to raise at all. In a poker tournament, he might get everyone to fold by making a large raise from the BB. But in a live game with loose opposition, a strange phenomenon occurs. One player decides to gamble for the $25. Then, another player sees that a large pot might be developing, so he'll make the call. Every subsequent player then begins to salivate, knowing that if he hits the right flop, he could win the pot that will make him a winner for the night. All of a sudden, Jake's created a monster. He has a decent amount of money invested while being out of position with a hand that needs to improve to stand any realistic chance of winning. No, thanks. I'll wait for a better spot to make a preflop raise.

What would be a better spot?

For one thing, you'd much rather have position on your opponents. A raise from the button is much more effective than one from the blinds. Your opponents have to act before you, so you'll have a better idea of whether or not any of them flopped something good. Plus, they will usually check to you on the flop anyway, giving you the option of seeing the turn card for free.

You'd also like to have a hand that you can bet on the flop even if it doesn't improve your poker game. In other words, you can bet an unimproved A-K, but if you get any action, you have to assume that you are beat. You might be able to bluff your way out of it, but whether it succeeds or not, you've put yourself in a tough spot. On the other hand, with something like Q-Q, you could easily get action from second-best hands even if you don't flop a set. Those are the situations you'd prefer.

Why should you raise more than three times the big blind?

Remember, there were originally two reasons to come in for three times the big blind. The first was that you want to raise enough to get the garbage out, but we've discussed how that won't happen in many of today's loose, smaller NL games. The other part of the equation was that you don't want to raise too much, either. You'd still like to get called by potential second-best hands. Well, it seems like lots of players with half-decent cards aren't shy about calling! You might as well make substantial bets with your premium hands if you are up against opponents who will give you action.

If you're in a $1-$2 NL game and pick up pocket aces, why make it only $6? I know that you don't want to chase everyone out, and that's understandable. But, if they are generally giving action when someone raises to $20, you might as well throw in $20! It goes against all standard poker logic to raise 10 times the BB with pocket aces, but it also goes against all logic to have several opponents call the $20! You must play to your opposition. They have essentially created a new poker logic. If they are making bad calls, give them every opportunity to do so, especially when you have a premium hand. You'll feel sick if you make it $20 to go with A-A in a loose $1-$2 NL game and get no callers. But, you'll feel even sicker if you raise to only $6, get several callers, and end up losing your entire stack to someone who flops two goofy pair.

The bottom line is this: Tripling the BB isn't accomplishing what it used to. There definitely are times when it is still the preferred play. But, you also must consider an oversized raise. If the situation is right, it might be just what you need.

Advertisement:
Come play poker at www.bikinipoker.com Just for playing, you will be rewarded with Loyalty Points which can be redeemed for free entry into special tournament events or your choice of our sharp logo wear from our Loyalty Point Redemption Center.

Daniel Negreanu has own column

April 19, 2005


Daniel Negreanu
By E&P Staff

NEW YORK A weekly column called "Playing Poker with Daniel Negreanu" is being syndicated by Card Shark Media.

Negreanu is the all-time money winner on the professional poker circuit -- with earnings of nearly $6 million since turning pro in 1998, according to the syndicate. He was 2004 ESPN Player of the Year, 2004 Card Player Magazine Player of the Year, and 2004 World Poker Tour Player of the Year. Negreanu, 30, is a Toronto native who now lives in Las Vegas.

The column includes poker strategies, tips, rules, and anecdotes. It addresses various poker games, not just Texas Hold 'Em.

Some No-Limit Hold'em Tournament Hands Played

April 18, 2005


by Bob Ciaffone, CardPlayer.com

Here are some hands that I played in Tunica at the World Poker Open in January. They have been selected for this column because I played them in an unusual manner, rather than in my more usual, straightforward style.

Before I discuss these hands, I would like to clarify what had happened in a Tunica hand that was discussed in one of my previous columns. My column said I was in the small blind, raised a pot preflop, and got called. Then it said I was checked to on the flop and moved in. It was graciously pointed out by a number of people that the small blind never gets checked to on the flop, because that person always acts first. In fact, I was on the button that hand. My apology.

I am a big believer in normally protecting my hand with a bet on the flop, instead of trying to be tricky. But look at how I decided to play this no-limit hold'em tournament hand. I had K-Q offsuit at a full table, with blinds of $25-$25. I started the hand with just over a grand in chips. The under-the-gun player called, I called, and three others behind me called. The small blind folded and the big blind rapped, so six of us saw the flop in a pot of $175. The flop came Kclubs Jclubs 8diamonds, which was both good and bad news for me. The good news was, I had top pair with a good kicker, which is normally a betting hand. The bad news was, there were five other players in who may well have helped, either to a made hand or a draw, because three cards in or next to the top half of the deck were on the board. The big blind and the under-the-gun player both checked, and I had to decide what to do. There was no way I could take the heat if someone raised my flop bet, and I thought it too dangerous to bet, so I also checked. The next two players after me also checked, and the button bet $125. The big blind called, the under-the-gun player folded, and once again it was up to me.

Every time the betting comes to you, it is necessary to re-evaluate the situation in light of the extra info gained. The button was a young player who had been betting aggressively, and could have had a wide range of hands here. If I called, there would be $650 in the pot and I would have about $900 left. Despite the dangerous board, the betting indicated that I may well have the best hand. Accordingly, I went all in. To my relief, the button folded without much thought, and the big blind went into the think tank. I figured he had top pair with a worse kicker and would be in bad shape if he played. Maybe he would put me on a draw for the way I had played, so I was pulling for him to play. Finally, he flashed a king and folded. I flashed him a smile, but no cards, and took the pot. I think this hand shows that each new situation should bring about a rethinking of strategy, regardless of whether you agree with the way I actually played on this occasion.

Here is another hand in which I went against my usual custom and checked the flop. In a tournament when the blinds were at the $25-$50 level, I raised from under the gun to $150 with pocket jacks. I had one caller, the small blind, so there was $350 in the pot preflop. The flop came Q-6-3 rainbow, not the best, but playable. However, when my opponent checked, I also checked. Aside from simply trying to vary my play, here is what I was thinking: If I had the best hand, he would have only five outs or fewer. If an overcard came, that would scare him more than me, inasmuch as after I had raised from under the gun and checked, he would be afraid that I had A-K.

The turn was an offsuit 8, which looked like a complete blank. He checked again, so I figured him for a small pair and bet $300. He called. The river brought a black 4, another innocuous card. He checked, and I got piggish, betting $500 with what I believed to be the best hand. This is an example of what the poker expression "bet for value" means, trying to milk an extra bet instead of just showing down a moderate hand. My opponent went into deep thought, and finally bit, throwing his chips in for a call in a resigned manner. When I showed him my jacks, he nodded his head and folded. I always feel good when I am able to extract some milk from what looks like a dry cow.

This next hand illustrates a situation that I have run into several times lately. The blinds were $200-$400 with a $50 ante at a ninehanded table. There was a lady in the game who had run her chips up to about $10,000, but had suffered a series of reversals and was now down to only $3,400. She was a solid and experienced player, although a bit straightforward, and had missed some opportunities. On this hand, she was in the cutoff seat and I was in the big blind with the Kclubs 7clubs. Everyone folded to her and she called. The small blind also called, so there was now $1,650 in the pot, and it was up to me. I figured that if the lady did not have enough hand to bet her last 3 grand when everyone had folded to her, she would probably fold to a raise, so I popped it $3,000 more. She shrugged her shoulders and called with all of her chips; the small blind folded. We showed our hands, and she had two fives, the best hand, but only about a 53 percent favorite to win the pot, according to Poker Probe. It turns out that her fives stood up, so she got new life, and I had a serious derailment.

Do not let results obscure the truth of a situation. My preflop raise was fine, as she might not have been able to call, and I was getting sufficient pot odds on the actual hand when she did. Her play of limping in and then calling a raise was poor strategy. If she had gone all in preflop with 5-5, as she should have, she would have won the pot without a fight, rather than facing a serious chance of reporting to the rail.

Bob Ciaffone has authored four poker books, Middle Limit Hold'em Poker, Pot-limit and No-limit Poker, Improve Your Poker, and Omaha Hold'em Poker. All can be ordered from Card Player. Ciaffone is available for poker lessons: e-mail thecoach@chartermi.net. His website is www.pokercoach.us, where you can get his rulebook, Robert's Rules of Poker, for free. Ciaffone is the cardroom director for ChecknRaisePoker.com.

 

Home
Reno Trips
Reno Poker Rooms
Online Poker
Poker Tips
Books Reviews
That Other Town
Submit Your Site
Poker Links
Contact Reno Poker Club

Online Poker Rooms

Online Sportsbooks

Online Casinos

Renopokerclub.com Poker feed Atom XML - RSS
Redlightpoker.com

 Want to learn more about our events?


*
Your Email Address: